January 15, 2006

Specter Mentions the I-Word

That’s impeachment. Today on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulus Senator Specter had the following to say:

STEPHANOPOULOS: There was a lot of talk about that at the Alito hearings, and listening closely to you I certainly seem to take away that you believe the president does not have the right, does not have the inherent power under the Constitution to circumvent a constitutional law, and as far as you are concerned, the FISA law is constitutional, isn’t it? SPECTER: Well, I started off by saying that he didn’t have the authority under the resolution authorizing the use of force. The president has to follow the Constitution. Where you have a law which is constitutional, like Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, there still may be collateral different powers in the president under wartime circumstances. That’s a very knotty question that I’m not prepared to answer on a Sunday soundbite. But I do believe that it ought to be thoroughly examined. And when we were on the Patriot Act and found the disclosure of the surveillance, I immediately said the Judiciary Committee would hold hearings, and I talked to the attorney general, and we’re going to explore it in depth, George. You can count on that. STEPHANOPOULOS: You know, if the president did break the law or circumvent the law, what’s the remedy? SPECTER: Well, the remedy could be a variety of things. A president — and I’m not suggesting remotely that there’s any basis, but you’re asking, really, theory, what’s the remedy? Impeachment is a remedy. After impeachment, you could have a criminal prosecution, but the principal remedy, George, under our society is to pay a political price.

As to the legality, Think Progress points to this article in the Washington Post regarding a report by the non-partisan Congressional Research Service. The report states “that the administration’s justification for the warrantless eavesdropping authorized by President Bush conflicts with existing law and hinges on weak legal arguments.”

Wouldn’t it be a twist of fate if things moved in the direction they should? After all Stephanopolous was the first in the media to mention impeachment during the Clinton scandal, and on his show it’s been mentioned again by a member of the President’s own party.

Filed under: Bush Administration, Civil Liberties — Gary Nuzzi @ 2:35 pm |

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

All content and comments are copyrighted by TwoDems.com and its owners. | Powered by WordPress