<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TwoDems &#187; Nate Silver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twodems.com/tag/nate-silver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twodems.com</link>
	<description>News, Opinion, Analysis &#38; Victory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nate Silver&#8217;s Analysis</title>
		<link>http://twodems.com/2010/01/21/nate-silvers-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://twodems.com/2010/01/21/nate-silvers-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zac Townsend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TwoDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodems.com/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nate Silver&#8217;s analysis here is spot on: the policies the Democrats have advocated are shockingly centrist, Republicans have been uniform in their brilliant opposition and the Democrats have no messaging and no symbols. I don&#8217;t really understand how you can run such a good campaign, and then be so bad on messaging, but Obama has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate Silver&#8217;s analysis <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/post-partisanship-epic-fail.html">here</a> is spot on: the policies the Democrats have advocated are shockingly centrist,  Republicans have been uniform in their brilliant opposition and the Democrats have no messaging and no symbols. I don&#8217;t really understand how you can run such a good campaign, and then be so bad on messaging, but Obama has found a way.</p>
<p>On symbols, I&#8217;d point out what Morone said in that talk I&#8217;ll post soon: &#8220;Advocates need to think big, Morone explained. The sixth commandment requires Americans to keep in mind that healthcare reform is about symbols: the nature of American society, our ideals, life and death. Responding to Republican claims that Obama’s plan will kill grandmothers by saying “it’s not true,” Morone said, was a very poor response. “Democrats are so in the weeds of the politics, they’re not very good at the symbols,” he said. Symbols require a philosophy, a victim, a plan, and a demon like, Morone joked, the insurance companies. “It’s not fair, but it’s effective.”&#8221; Why doesn&#8217;t Obama give a passionate speech (Well, the man can&#8217;t muster passion about anything) about people in this country dying because they don&#8217;t have health care&#8230;.instead of say, throwing around a lot of statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://twodems.com/2010/01/21/nate-silvers-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

