December 13, 2005

Indictments Tomrrow?

The CIA Leak case is of course not over, and now Raw Story is reporting that tomorrow Fitzgerald may seek an indictment on Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove. From the article, here’s the important part:

In a bid to keep Rove out of Fitzgerald’s crosshairs, Luskin recently told Fitzgerald that he had a conversation with Time magazine reporter Viveca Novak in February 2004 where she inadvertently revealed that Rove had been a source for her colleague Matt Cooper. Luskin said this prompted an exhaustive search for evidence that Cooper and Rove spoke. The search turned up an email Rove had sent to then Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley just minutes after his conversation with Cooper in which he told Hadley what they had spoken about. Luskin said he promptly turned over the email to Fitzgerald and that led Rove to change his testimony.

A week ago, Fitzgerald briefed the second grand jury hearing evidence in the leak case for more than three hours. During that time, he brought them up to speed on the latest developments involving Rove and at least one other White House official, the sources said. The attorneys refused to identify the second person.

Well maybe Fitzmas will come closer to Christmas after all. This of course is important because people already forgot that Fitzgerald wasn’t limited to the first grand jury at all, not sure how that meme ever got started.

Tags: , — Gary Nuzzi @ 11:46 pm | Comments (0)

December 12, 2005

Abramoff

Good graphic on the Washington Post’s website called “Abramoff Spread the Wealth.”

Tags: , — Zac Townsend @ 9:24 pm | Comments (0)

Consistency!

Hello, TwoDems readers! Thanks, Zac and Gary for having me–it’s an honor. Without further ado, then, here’s some political philosophy.

Can anyone explain to me why:

Someone can believe that government should be miniscule, should stay away from our property and our money, but should espouse a particular religion or should keep porn off the streets? These seem mutually exclusive to me.

In the same vein, President Bush avers that ‘freedom is on the march’–that we will spread human rights and equality and freedom around the glove, and that this is our destiny. And then he argues that we can torture anyone we want at Guantanamo because Constitutional rights only apply inside US borders. What gives?

Tags: , , — Jonathan Margolick @ 2:16 pm | Comments (1)

November 12, 2005

It Gets Worse

According to a release sent to The Raw Story Bush’s numbers have fallen even lower in the latest Newsweek Poll.

58 percent of Americans disapprove of the president’s handling of his job-a five-point decrease in approval since the September 29-30 Newsweek Poll. On the topic of how Bush is handling certain aspects of his job, 60 percent of those polled disapprove of the way he is handling the economy, 32 percent approve. Seventy-three percent disapprove of Bush’s handling of oil prices, 20 percent approve.

The poll has more troubling results, on the question of the direction of the country, Bush is doing even worse:

Sixty-eight percent of Americans are dissatisfied with the way things are going in the United States at this time, a seven-point drop in satisfaction since the last Newsweek Poll. Only 26 percent are satisfied.

And of course not to ignore Plamegate, the latest polling on Cheney isn’t too good either:

Fifty-two percent of Americans believe that Cheney was part of a cover up to try to prevent the special prosecutor from getting the truth about who leaked CIA agent Valerie Plame’s name to the news media, 27 percent do not believe he was involved.

And regarding the actions of Cheney and the White House Iraq Group and the reasons we are now at war:

When asked if the vice president deliberately misused or manipulated pre-war intelligence about Iraq’s nuclear capabilities in order to build support for war with Iraq-52 percent say he misused intelligence, 33 percent say he did not. Overall, 65 percent of Americans disapprove of Bush’s handling of the situation in Iraq, only 32 percent approve according to the latest Newsweek Poll.

Does anyone else remember when Bush called a 2% victory a mandate? Well what does he consider the last couple of months, sure looks like a whole different mandate to me. While Bush goes on political stunts yesterday during Veterans Day in a way to try to regain support the American people are seeing right through it. He’s exhausted all of his special backdrops, is manufactured media events, this President, his party, and his Congress have been weakened to new heights. In the coming months, and I expect shortly before or after the President’s last State of the Union before mid-term elections we will see a new Democratic plan for the country, and it’s time to put it into play.

Tags: , — Gary Nuzzi @ 3:49 pm | Comments (0)

November 10, 2005

Cracking Everywhere

If it’s one thing we would expect the Republican leadership to agree on it would be spending cuts. Republicans love spending cuts, cut spending, cut taxes, let the chips fall where they may, and now RawStory is reporting they can’t find enough votes to pass their own budget in the House. It seems though that this ins’t their only shortcoming, in fact it appears as though the GOP leadership besieged with scandals, corruption, and low public opinion, is falling apart at the seems. Yesterday over on DailyKos we read that the GOP has dropped plans to drill in ANWR. I mean I think it’s more than fair for us to look at this and ask what in the hell is going on. They control both houses and the White House, they’ve been wanting to drill in ANWR for years, and have been waiting for a chance to cut spending, all of their dreams are coming true, and they still can’t make things happen.

On the ANWR story:

Republican leaders in the U.S. House of Representatives abandoned, at least temporarily, a drive to open Alaska’s National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling after concluding on Wednesday the initiative was threatening passage of a huge bill to cut spending.

“ANWR and OCS will be out” of the legislation, said House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle, an Iowa Republican.

Besides the Alaska oil drilling initiative, the House spending-reduction bill had also called for opening outer-continental shelf, or offshore areas, to oil and gas drilling.

Let’s recall that drilling in Alaska was a major campaign goal of Bush in his energy policy and now it appears as though it won’t be happening for some time.

That’s not all however. According to Republican Senator Charles Grassley from Iowa, Social Security Reform is not only off the table for this Congress, but also the next, and won’t be revisited until the next Presidential election.

Not taking into account Democratic opposition, Republican members of the Senate Finance Committee have not been able to reach an agreement on proposed changes.

Grassley said he will try to get his fellow committee members to act sooner than 2009, but those efforts may be hampered by next year’s Congressional elections.

“I’m pessimistic that it could come up before 2009,” Grassley said. “Doesn’t mean that I won’t try to bring it up before 2009.”

So we have a budget, energy, and now as we all knew Social Security all falling behind, not to mention approval ratings that don’t break 40%. This president is in serious trouble, and his Congress isn’t doing anything to help.

But then comes the bigger question, can we as Democrats offer a positive plan for America for the mid-term elections in 2006. One year away the media is already harping on this, we should be clear the “Contract with America” wasn’t born until six weeks before the midterms in 1994. However, and in some ways unfortunately, because they did it, the expectations gap is on the Democrats now to come out with a plan for the midterms and by the first of the new year I imagine. The question is can Reid with all of the excellent work he’s been doing to draw attention to the administrations failures, come up with a strategy to convince the American people that we will do better.

Tags: , — Gary Nuzzi @ 6:19 pm | Comments (0)

Medal of Freedom

So, yesterday I was watching and learned that a number of people were awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Many of the recipients were well deserved, including outgoing Federal Reserve chair Alan Greenspan. Then I remembered one of the last people to be awarded the Medal, CIA Director George “Slam Dunk” Tenet. Last month I wrote about the 16 words in the State of the Union that triggered the entire Wilson-Plame scandal, and how the CIA warned the white House not to use the statement in the speech.

However, as we all know he did anyway, and somehow after the revelations of Joe Wilson, the man they claim to be motivated by politics although funny how he was right, George Tenet and the CIA took the blame. I’ve thought about this a number of times, and every time I think about it, I can’t help but ask myself, did Tenet take the bullet for the White House. If the CIA was so wrong and Tenet caused Bush all of this trouble why award him the Medal? Now, at the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist I think it’s more than possible that the medal was given to George as a way of saying thank you for taking all the heat.

Tags: — Gary Nuzzi @ 5:33 pm | Comments (1)

November 9, 2005

How Cute

This one really is just too good. Pissed off about Valerie Plame and trying to shift the focus away from well everything, the GOP leaders are demanding an investigation into how the CIA “black sites” story was leaked to the Washington Post.

Congress’s top Republican leaders yesterday demanded an immediate joint House and Senate investigation into the disclosure of classified information to The Washington Post that detailed a web of secret prisons being used to house and interrogate terrorism suspects.

The Post’s article, published on Nov. 2, has led to new questions about the treatment of detainees and the CIA’s use of “black sites” in Eastern Europe and elsewhere. The issue dogged President Bush on his recent trip to Latin America and has created consternation in Eastern Europe.

So now they get their panties in a bunch, but where’s the outrage about miss-used intelligence? Look, I have no problem with Congress taking on this investigation, they should things like this aren’t supposed to get leaked to the media. However, when the leak happened with Valerie Plame Republicans said the same things, but they also said it provided an opportunity to examine the motives of Joe Wilson. For most their attacks didn’t stick, but with this story, the media is now examining the motives of the government in using these prisons. It is forcing an honest and open debate about torture, and we should be having that debate especially post 9/11.

Tags: — Gary Nuzzi @ 1:54 pm | Comments (1)

November 3, 2005

Rove’s Role Debated

The cover story on the Washington Post regards White House aides wondering if Rove should remain. I mean the story pretty much speaks for itself, but I wouldn’t except to see a Rove departure, at least not until December when the year ends, and Bush can clean house, which he like other Presidents when faced with second term difficulties have done.

“Karl does not have any real enemies in the White House, but there are a lot of people in the White House wondering how they can put this behind them if the cloud remains over Karl,” said a GOP strategist who has discussed the issue with top White House officials. “You can not have that [fresh] start as long as Karl is there.”

More importantly, if Rove is still indicted while he is working in the White House it will only provide more trouble for Bush already at new lows in approval ratings. With Senator Lott also questioning the role Rove plays, calls by Senator Reid for Rove to resign are not only appropriate, but appear to be mainstream.

Tags: — Gary Nuzzi @ 1:22 pm | Comments (0)

CBS Has Bush at 35%

CBS has just released a new poll showing the President at his lowest approval rating of all time. That’s right Bush has slid lower than Clinton did at the height of the scandal involving Monica Lewinsky.

Bush,
Now
Approve 35%
Disapprove 57%

Clinton
1/1998
Approve 58%
Disapprove 29%

2/1998
Approve 72%
Disapprove 22%

7/1998
Approve 64%
Disapprove 29%

10/1998
Approve 65%
Disapprove 30%

12/1998
Approve 66%
Disapprove 30%

Is it wrong for us to start writing the chapter in the Presidential history books that say failure?

Tags: — Gary Nuzzi @ 1:10 am | Comments (0)

November 2, 2005

Scotty Running Scared

Today at the Press Conference, Scott McClellan tried to deflect any questions about the White House’s use of pre-war intelligence in making its case for war. Sadly for the Republicans the new party line isn’t new at all; it’s the same one they’ve been trying to pawn off since dissent began. Democrats also voted for the war, so we couldn’t have misused intelligence. The point is McClellan that they voted for the war based on the intelligence given to them by the White House.

He said the Clinton administration and fellow Democrats “used the intelligence to come to the same conclusion that Saddam Hussein and his regime were a threat.”

Yes, Clinton did recognize Saddam Hussein as a threat, but he didn’t make the decision to take the nation to war while we were already engaged in Afghanistan. The faults in McClellan’s arguments are clear as day, and if this White House is going to get around them they need a better line than Democrats voted for the war. That’s what deception is guys, you take the intelligence re-frame it to make a compelling case for war that Congress approves, and then all the reasons you gave Congress turn out to be false.

This White House strategy gets employed by young children every day, it’s saying that if I lie to you to get you to loan me your lunch money then I pull out five dollars of my own, and my response to you is “well you gave it to me, so obviously you were ok with it”. Maybe someone needs to clue this White House in on what the definition of deception is, or they can ask Scooter, I imagine he’s getting quite the lesson on it.

Tags: — Gary Nuzzi @ 2:48 pm | Comments (0)

October 31, 2005

Those Fake Documents

Amid all the debate over the indictments and now the Supreme Court nominee, let’s not forget the Italian forgeries. I was just watching the Countdown, and a writer forThe American Conservative, Phillip Giraldi, was on promoting his new piece in the upcoming issue. It should be noted that it was written before the indictments were handed down on Friday. The article is very important for two reasons, one shows that some conservatives still care about governmental accountability, and two the writer is a former CIA officer. The article is very meticulous and walks us through the events surrounding the forged Niger documents day by day.

In February 2002, Pollari and Berlusconi resubmitted their report to Washington with some embellishments, resulting in Joe Wilson’s trip to Niger. Wilson visited Niamey in February 2002 and subsequently reported to the CIA that the information could not be confirmed.

Enter Michael Ledeen, the Office of Special Plans’ man in Rome. Ledeen was paid $30,000 by the Italian Ministry of the Interior in 1978 for a report on terrorism and was well known to senior SISMI officials. Italian sources indicate that Pollari was eager to engage with the Pentagon hardliners, knowing they were at odds with the CIA and the State Department officials who had slighted him. He turned to Ledeen, who quickly established himself as the liaison between SISMI and Feith’s OSP, where he was a consultant. Ledeen, who had personal access to the National Security Council’s Condoleezza Rice and Stephen Hadley and was also a confidant of Vice President Cheney, was well placed to circumvent the obstruction coming from the CIA and State.

The timing, August 2002, was also propitious as the administration was intensifying its efforts to make the case for war. In the same month, the White House Iraq Group (WHIG) was set up to market the war by providing information to friends in the media. It has subsequently been alleged that false information generated by Ahmad Chalabi’s Iraqi National Congress was given to Judith Miller and other journalists through WHIG.

On Sept. 9, 2002, Ledeen set up a secret meeting between Pollari and Deputy National Security Adviser Hadley. Two weeks before the meeting, a group of documents had been offered to journalist Elisabetta Burba of the Italian magazine Panorama for $10,000, but the demand for money was soon dropped and the papers were handed over. The man offering the documents was Rocco Martino, a former SISMI officer who delivered the first WMD dossier to London in October 2002. That Martino quickly dropped his request for money suggests that the approach was a set-up primarily intended to surface the documents.

These three paragraphs are perhaps the most important because they paint the picture that is often unreported. Most importantly it discusses the White House Iraq Group, a group that took over the intelligence gathering process for the White House in the march to war, and disagreed often with CIA estimates. Not only that but it further implicates Judith Miller as one of the reporters that was used to slip the false information into the papers and the public.

Prior to presenting these forgeries the new Italian Prime Minister brought with him, in his visit to America after 9/11, intelligence his country had gathered. It suggested for the first time the link between Niger and Iraq, but people in our government new better.

But the Italian information was inconclusive and old, some of it dating from the 1980s. The British, the CIA, and the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research analyzed the intelligence and declared that it was lacking in detail and very limited in scope.

Why is that so important? We are often quick to criticize the CIA and our intelligence after 9/11 and while there were problems, they remain largely on point, they were able to see right through this sham. Then why did it end up in the State of the Union? Is it, as we were told the fault of the CIA, the fault of George Tenent? No, it most certainly was not:

On Jan. 28, 2003, over the objections of the CIA and State, the famous 16 words about Niger’s uranium were used in President Bush’s State of the Union address justifying an attack on Iraq: The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Both the British and American governments had actually obtained the report from the Italians, who had asked that they not be identified as the source. The UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency also looked at the documents shortly after Bush spoke and pronounced them crude forgeries.

Again, our CIA did the job, then why did Tenent take the blame? We can’t be sure, but we do know this for whatever reason George drank W’s kool-aid, and as a result the American people came to further distrust the CIA and place more trust in the White House, and when we think about it that’s what this whole leak, this whole case, it’s what everything is about.

Why else would the White House take the time and energy to discredit a critic of the Administration, they went after no one in the way they attacked Joe Wilson. Wilson was attacked, his wife’s name was leaked, because he posed a threat to the plans of the White House Iraq Group, he was able to begin poking holes into why we were in war in the first place, and now despite the CIA once taking the blame, the truth begins to come out. Yes the case is about what Libby did before the Grand Jury, but on the periphery and as a result of this case the truth in why we are in Iraq is coming out.

In short this White House has done the unthinkable, not only did they bring us to war under false pretenses, they used forged documents, they took over the job of intelligence gathering from the CIA, they caused the American people to lose faith in the CIA, and blamed all of the problems on George Tenent. And now their House of Cards is coming down.

Tags: — Gary Nuzzi @ 9:46 pm | Comments (0)

October 30, 2005

The WaPo Poll

The Washington Post has the President at his lowest approval rating ever, at 39%. However, what’s more important is what else the poll says about the indictments and what is going on recently.

41. As you may know, a federal grand jury has indicted Lewis “Scooter” Libby, chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney, on charges of obstruction of justice and perjury in connection with the case in which the identity of an undercover CIA agent was disclosed to news reporters. Libby has resigned his White House position.

In your opinion, do you think the charge against Libby represents (a serious) crime, or (a minor or technical) one?

68% said a serious crime, only 26% called it minor or technical. Another question provides results that give excellent light on the current situation; the President is polling behind Clinton in the ethics question.

38. How would you rate Bush’s handling of ethics in government – excellent, good, only fair or poor?

34% say excellent or good, while 65% say fair or poor, in the fair and poor breakdown poor out weights the fair at 35%. Clinton at the end of his term on this question polled at 37% in excellent or good, and 62% in fair and poor. Not only have Bush’s numbers sank to an all time high, but they are lower than Clinton’s after the scandal when it comes to governmental ethics.

Tags: — Gary Nuzzi @ 12:52 pm | Comments (0)

All content and comments are copyrighted by TwoDems.com and its owners. | Powered by WordPress